🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.